1983- graduated from the Theatre and Art Institute in Minsk.(Academy of Arts)
1986-1991 - teacher at the College of Arts in Minsk.
1997- receives a grant, Kanton Aargau ,Stiftung Kunstlerhaus Boswil, Switzerland.
2000 - lives and works in Brussels.
2005 - 51 Biennale, Venezia
Le Chapeau Rouge in the partisan woods or a story from the lives of Soutine and Bacon
Igor
Tishin is one of the brightest and most talented artists of the new
wave of the Belorussian art marked by an active search of its new
identity. Tishin was born in 1958 in the village of Vasilpolye. Being a
graduate of the Minsk Academy of Arts, he underwent the formal training
in monumental Socialist Realism and was inspired by the legendary
Belorussian modernists Marc Chagall and Chaim Soutine and the Russian
avant-garde. In 1997 Tishin received an art grant in Switzerland where
he got a better opportunity to get acquainted with modern and
contemporary art. In 2000 the artist moved to Belgium – the country of
comic strips. Eventually the artist develops his repertory of
melancholic and burlesque images.
Tishin’s unbridled
creative energy overflows the boundaries of established aesthetic
norms and produces a fascinating mixture of visual cultures, inspired
by art and literary movements such as monumental Socialist realism,
Constructivism, Dada, ‘kolkhoz’ visual culture, ‘cosy’ Surrealism of
Marc Chagall, Expressionism of Soutine and Bacon, the Laboratory of
Russian Futurists, Sigmund Freud, contemporary comic strips, poetics
of the Absurd by Daniil Kharms, works of Gilles Deleuze and Franz
Kafka, cinema, old photographs and family albums, letters, graffiti,
newspaper clips, early childhood memories. Igor Tishin treats reality
with gusto of a collectioner in the disguise of either an antiquarian
picking up the valuable objects disposed of by the civilization or a
writer recording and reconstructing the shreds of other people’s
conversation and voices.
Wild, absurd and sensual aesthetics
with no rules and hierarchy is the outcome of a complex ‘laboratory’
study of imagery and textuality of our epoch. Tishin renders personal
and collective visual memory by clashing together two main media of the
Soviet culture – the monumental painting and photography.
Painting remains to be the main medium and aim of Tishin’s art. In his
works of 2008 the genre of painting is further intensified and
liberated, as if the energy of his creative passion has been purified
and distilled. Tishin sees his painting as part of continuous
development in art beginning from Rembrandt and Titian, when the colour
(colorito) began to prevail over the line (disegno). Tishin considers
Chaim Soutine and Francis Bacon who continued the school of colour in
painting to be among his teachers and dedicates to them a series of
paintings and two manuscripts – ‘The Line of Soutine’ and
‘Ts.Ts.P.Ts.” - a motley pseudo-historical investigation in the style
of Borges, full of fantasy and mystification. Tishin recalls that when
he was a young student he met Bacon by chance in 1974 in a Minsk bomb
shelter turned into a shop selling paints. Bacon had come to Belarus
driven by his interest to Soutine. The paints bought in the same shop
where Tishin met Bacon became an ironic symbol of continuity. Staying
true to one of the oldest artistic media, Tishin takes on himself the
responsibility for its history and future.
Igor Tishin is a
virtuoso of monumental form. This advantage, being a blessing of the
Soviet academic school to Russian artists, is in high demand by today’s
art market. But Tishin’s monumentalism is always relative and
ambiguous, its impact being reduced by either deliberately primitive
graffiti or by overpowering animation of the painterly surface or by
aesthetics of the absurd and comical. And vice versa – the childish
cheerfulness of his art masks the tragedy of human history and the
brutality of human instincts.
Over-sized colourful canvases
ironically reproduce the iconic images of photography of the 20’s and
30’s – the time of widespread glorification of a hero in Soviet and
Western cultures. Tishin’s main focus is on the visual strategy of
hero’s glorification, artistic utopias and their creators, the
transformation of political myths into the myths of art and mass visual
culture. He treats these themes with a playful irony of a post-Soviet
artist appropriating familiar photographic and cinematic images in his
own multidisciplinary and optical game, randomly combining various
mythological topoi. Leni Riefenstahl – the main figure of the
fascist culture in the 30’s – is represented to the beholder as ‘Le
Chapeau Rouge’. In his diptych ‘Heidi+Heidi’ Tishin substitutes the
image of the Swiss heroine popularized in the 30’s with an image of a
young Soviet pioneer photographed by Alexander Rodchenko in 1930 and
rendered from a dynamic, low angle of vision. Tishin repeats and
distorts the face of the young pioneer and exaggerates the extreme low
point of vision. This playful contortion sends us back to the history
of illusionism in art – the art that often promoted utopian ideals.
Thus,
the monumental art of the Italian Renaissance and Baroque with its
claim to mimetic representation constructed the fictitious space in
relation to the beholder by elongating the figures of cathedral
frescoes to bring them into perspective when viewed from below. The
Constructivists of the Soviet avant-garde experimented with unusual
viewpoints using a newly invented hand camera and employed techniques
that dramatized the construction of the image in order to redeem our
vision and to create new optimistic representation of the world. Their
ideas were widely exploited later by the Soviet propaganda and the
extreme viewpoints and tilted horizons can be found in paintings and
panoramas of ‘Stalinist baroque’ of the 30’s and 50’s. Finally, the
digital technology accomplished, albeit virtually, the utopian ideal of
world creation by randomly transforming a three-dimensional image.
The very creators of artistic styles whose personalities never cease to
attract Tishin, despite the monumental rendering of their
representations, remind us of carnivalesque victims of history (Leni
Riefenstahl in ‘Le Chapeau Rouge’, Natalya Goncharova in ‘Futurist 1
and 2’, Daniil Kharms in ‘Poet’, Vladimir Mayakovsky in ‘Poet’, series
‘Francis Bacon’).
Along with the painting Tishin works with
photography and space. By using photography as a basis for painterly
interventions, he masterly and with great ease combines the real and
the imaginary. Varied levels of representation enter into a confab
producing a mysterious and perplexing effect (Series ‘The Path of
Alice’, 2008).
In the photographic series ‘Light Partisan
Movement’ (1997) Igor Tishin initiated a new interpretation of the
partisan theme in post-Soviet Belorussian culture. The partisan
resistance of the long-suffering Belorussia made a substantial
contribution to the victory of the USSR in the Second World War The
partisan narrative was elaborated by the Soviet cinema and literature
and was closely associated with the image of Belarus in mass culture.
With the demise of the USSR this subject was temporarily abandoned and
then – in the 2000s – underwent revision. The new Belorussian culture
strives to find its new national identity in the ironic image of a
partisan, a woodland clandestine dweller defying all systems and
political regimes. This partisan protects his spiritual heritage in the
thickets of Belorussian woods and marshlands, biding his time, playing
a game of hide-and-seek or offering clandestine resistance.
In 1997 Tishin organized the exhibition ‘Light Partisan Movement’ in a
derelict house of Minsk ‘partisans-tramps’ where he placed his
installations and photographs. The exhibition was financed by Soros
Fund and the artist was later summoned by the secret service. Three
years later a contemporary art magazine titled ‘Partisan’ saw the light
in Minsk. The front cover of the first issue carried one of Tishin’s
‘partisan’ photos and the magazine published an interview with the
artist. And a few years later a festival of Belorussian art ‘Partisan
Art’ took place in the French city of Clermont-Ferrand where Tishin was
invited as ‘the grandfather of the partisan movement’.
The
subject of a body as a focal point of subjective experience and
cultural and historical transformation stands out in Tishin’s work and
places it in the discourse of modern philosophy and humanities. In his
early works ‘the body’ is obtrusively fragmented, splintered and
insistently presented in the forms of fetishes - women’s feet in
shoes, palms of hands and distanced, ‘appropriated’ women’s faces.
Tishin quotes philosopher Gilles Deleuze, ‘A fetish is not a symbol; it
is like a fixed and frozen sketch’. In more recent works the artist
strives to create a sensation of integral and unified body in the
making – in the spirit of Deleuze’s ‘body without organs’ trying to
overcome its structural disembodiment.
In his series ‘1932’
the body is represented as a historical product of communication and
illustration in different epochs and cultures. In modern humanities
and, in particular, in contemporary interdisciplinary ‘body studies’
the body is viewed as one of the media carrying the traces of history.
‘In this way a human body is viewed as a palimpsest covered with
inscriptions, a perfect tool for reconstructing societal norms’, ‘as an
object and memory of historical evidence of brutal or structural
violence’.
It is as if Tishin literally illustrates this
popular post-structuralist metaphor by staging in his paintings the
gestures, postures and costumes from different epochs, by covering the
faces of his heroes with inscriptions and signs. In some of his
paintings the text is applied to the entire painterly surface and
flattens the plane of the painting by bringing the narrative component
to the foreground (‘The Unfinished Portrait’, ‘Poet. Daniil Kharms’).
Sometimes ‘the print’ is reduced to multi-coloured brushstrokes, just
as the historical memory – to traces of collective affectation.
The body is also a place where language disappears, it is the centre of
the inexpressible and inconceivable ‘other’, where all signs lose their
meaning. When the historic interpretation of the body is seen by
Tishin through the art of Rodchenko, the mystery of the body beyond
the language and history is tied with the art of Soutine and Bacon
and he further develops their theme in his ‘Sketch Books’.
This
‘other’ of historically manipulated body transforms into sexuality in
Tishin’s art. Not in cultural and historical sense as Michael Foucault
saw it, but rather in a magical meaning as we know it from the art of
Georges Bataille, Roger Caillois and other Surrealists. Sexuality is
concentrated in the hypnotic gaze of his figures as a primeval creative
force which remains, in the long run, the moving force of history.